When Maggie Thatcher became Prime Minister in 1979,
she brought new ideas for the BBC. The "Thatcherite" project called
for more individualism and deregulation of broadcasting. Deregulating
turned out to be "highly centralizing" and less individualistic
by "delegitimizing, eradicating, and diminishing any institution
or organization that had alternate views."
Maggie did this in two major ways. First, she appointed
Governors to the BBC’s Board of Governor’s by first
asking “Is he one of us?” She wanted people in charge
of BBC to have the same views as she did so it would be run the
way she wanted it ran. Power in the BBC quickly shifted, and people
were fired because the board started to interfere with the major
aspects of the Corporation. After Maggie appointed her board members,
there was a change in programming, at least with the programs that
Maggie felt were unsuitable. The Board seemed to dislike everything
the Corporation was doing and had done, making it a very tense working
environment. There were mixed views on whether this new policy of
politically packing the Board would work, some thought that appointing
the Governors should be based on their merits, not on their political
stance.
The other way Maggie BBC was by cutting the license
fee. The license fee is the fee that citizens pay when they buy
a television and the annual fee they pay for using the BBC programs.
By not raising the license fee, the government could hurt BBC profits
greatly. During the 1980s, BBC’s production costs were rising,
and there was no natural increase in the licensing fee to help them
out because the government was determined to ‘change the nature’
of the BBC.
With all the new changes came new management principles.
The first goal was to use resources more efficiently, “Part
of the incentive for reform came from the need to cut production
costs, and to use plant and people more efficiently. Prior to Maggie,
BBC had to teach their people how to build sets, apply makeup, create
costumes, among many other production necessities, but the new belief
was all of this was wasteful. Also, the BBC discarded two of its
studios, the on in Manchester, which had never been opened, and
Elstree Studios was older and didn’t have the image that the
new BBC was going for. Going along with the idea that BBC needed
to stop spending as much, they decided that getting some of their
programs from other places instead of producing it all themselves
was a good idea. They eventually were receiving 25% of their programs
from outside the Corporation.
The second goal was to ‘reduce dissent within
organizations’. They believed that workers “have a right
to do their own things in their own way as long as it is in the
common interest, that people need to be well informed, well intentioned,
and well educated in order to interpret their common interest.”
So they allowed the workers at BBC to work on their own as long
as it went along with the overall goal of the company. Curran believes
that for real creativity a person needs disagreement, something
to get ‘the juices flowing’. When the rules were changed
and workers were given more freedoms, Curran believes the level
of creativity went down because there was no longer a struggle “…the
fertile argument, and sense of ideas flowing that encourage creativity,
seemed so alien to the new, neatly managed structure.”
The third objective was to ‘demonstrate that
organizations were willing to be managed better. BBC brought in
four separate consulting firms to supervise reforms, and there was
very little doubt that the Corporation needed to be renovated. Once
the management consultants got into BBC, it became more about the
managers and less about the programmers. Since the managers were
considered to be more important and the programmers were trying
to get to that same level of importance, they had less time to focus
on their creative duties, greatly affecting the quality of the programming
BBC produced.
Prime Minister Thatcher’s plans were not completely
carried out for different reasons. William Whitelaw was a major
player in the destruction of Maggie Thatcher’s plans. He was
her closest Cabinet member, but he didn’t fully agree with
her changes. He believed that “We should be most careful not
to endanger what we have achieved.” He also didn’t believe
higher standards could be met by deregulation and financial competition,
two of Maggie’s reforms within BBC. Having someone on the
inside in favor of keeping BBC proved helpful. Also, the fact that
the public liked the programming that BBC put on made it impossible
for deregulation. There was a “sense that programs reflect
and shape viewers’ and listeners’ interests,”
and people didn’t want to lose those qualities. Unfortunately
for Mrs. Thatcher, her reforms helped BBC to become strong enough
to stick around. With all the financial cuts that BBC had to go
through, it was forced to learn how to continue to cut costs and
run more effectively. So originally cutting costs was a downfall,
but in the long run it helped them out.
In the end, BBC has not yet been ‘politically
compromised’. It is still one of the major broadcasting companies
in the world. To date, Maggie Thatcher’s administration was
the biggest challenge that the BBC has ever had to face, and they
came out the victor.
Alison Chernick '07