Jason
Bryant
It
would seem that since man has been aware of his existence there has been a
desire on his part to be in control. At
first it would be over others, but later, once enlightened, the target of the
control would be ones self. In the
following, the issue of self-discipline will be addressed from two views; a
modern perspective by Michel Foucault, and a two thousand year old view as seen
by Sun-Tzu. Both of these, no matter
when written, address an issue as old as man himself, the issue of
self-control.
The
training involved in the indisciplining of a soldier in preparation for defense
in time of war is done so to produce what Foucault would call a “docile body”[1].
This docile body would be a person who is capable of being whatever he
is called on to be in service to some figure of authority. This of course is seen in the light of
defense of a people or country. Tzu
begins his section on Strategic Assessments by saying,
“Military
action is important to the nation-it is the ground of death and life, the path
of survival and destruction, so it is imperative to examine it.”[2]
When
studying these thinkers and approaching the idea of a self-discipline, one can
begin to view everyday life as a battleground on which is fought the war for
true individuality. The soldier will be
trained to insure that his thoughts, when faced with military decisions, those
of survival, protection, etc., will most certainly be those of the figure of
authority he is in service to; and an entire body of soldiers, trained and
operating under this type of discipline, we call an army. But what about the individual who is simply
trying to be his full self? What about
the person who is fighting his own personal war to be in control of his
being? As Tzu said, it is imperative
that the military action be examined.
One needs to step away from ones self and see what it is that would be
in need of correction, or, we could say, examine the battlefield, and see ones
self as an opponent to be overtaken and mastered. As surely as those in authority want each
soldier to be fully obedient, for, as the body becomes “more obedient it
becomes more useful,”[3] the individual comes to realize that his
life is most fully developed when he is in complete, rational control over his
actions.
“Discipline
increases the forces of the body.”[4]
The more one is in control of the tools at his disposal, be it many
hundreds of men acting as one, or one person simply in full control of his
self, discipline increases efficiency. One
must be sure of ones actions and thoughts.
Just as the army has no time to think in most situations, it must simply
do, the less time the individual has to spend thinking and debating
within him self the more time there is for action, whatever it might be. One must be in control and not at war inside
the mind. Wang Xi, when commenting on
Master Sun says:
“Harmony
among people is the basis of the Way of military operations;…When leadership is
able, then there will be good discipline.”[5]
And from Zhang Yu:
“Discipline
means that regulations are strict and clear.”[6]
Both of
these would seem to point to the idea that the one who has discipline, the one
who has control over the self, is already at an advantage for doing battle with
irrational impulses. One must be in
harmony with ones self if the fullness of being is to be apprehended. Being aware of the self and its placement in
the world give one the advantage of control from within, being ones sole
authority. Foucault, in the section the
art of distributions states that “discipline proceeds from the distribution
of individuals in space. Discipline
sometimes requires enclosure.”[7]
This does not always have to mean enclosure within a physical structure
such as a building. For our purposes we
will see it as a person’s drawing within ones self for the purpose of gathering
self knowledge with the intent of emerging as ones sole authority, having come
to know the machine from within. Zhang
Yu, when discussing strategy as seen by Master Sun, writes:
“When your
strategy is deep and far-reaching, then what you gain by your calculations is
much, so you can win before you even fight…Therefore it is said that victorious
warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first
and then seek to win.”[8]
It would
seem then that, to win in life is to first examine your living, and then to
begin living fully in each moment and carry living this into each moment of
life. Zhang Yu’s comment could be
paraphrased as; a person should live first and then go into life as opposed to
going into life trying to discover living.
Foucault, in the section the means of correct training, states,
“Discipline makes individuals.”[9] He proceeds through the section by
talking about observatories, places where people can be watched, studied, many
times without their knowing it. And
while this kind of surveillance of a people without their knowledge of it being
done is most certainly an invasion of sorts, from our approach this is a good
example of becoming aware. Through
careful introspection of ones self many things can be brought into light. This taking time to observe the self in
relation to the body can allow for greater control and increased awareness in
the living. Observation of the
individual appetites and their desire for control can be observed and
countered, but they must first be acknowledged.
Master Sun, when discussing the planning of a siege writes:
“Take
three months to prepare your machines and three months to complete your siege
engineering.”[10]
Du Mu furthers
this with his comment:
“He means
that it is necessary to take time to really prepare…those who cannot deploy
their machines effectively are in trouble”[11]
It would
seem then that the one who is most aware of ones self, most in tune with ones
being is the one who will be able to deploy into life better his machine of
living. It can also be gleaned from this
reading that one has only higher levels of discipline to attain; a further hold
to grasp on one’s self. Foucault
describes the distribution of ranks and classes among soldiers and especially
within grade schools wherein pupils were moved forward, retained, or even
demoted, all according to their performance within the learning
environment. Levels would be seen as
markings on the uniform or even the uniform itself as those who were seen to be
having the hardest time adapting to the system would have it removed and
replaced by sackcloth.[12]
From this it can be gleaned that we can always move forward, starting
where we are and looking to gain more control over the machine of being that is
ours. Rewarding ourselves when there is
growth and acknowledging without hesitation when we have digressed, Foucault
understands this as a process of “normalizing”[13], a process wherein others are brought up
to another’s (usually society’s) standard of what is considered normal. Once we have set a goal of complete control
of our selves, control in all situations no matter what, and see this as
normal, we can go about normalizing our selves.
All of our emotions could be seen as pupils, and since the learning
process is disrupted when pupils are acting out on their own, we could very
well see ourselves as the head master of an institution of learning seeking
conformity of the pupils to the will of the one.
Foucault
writes:
“… it
exercised over them a constant pressure to conform to the same model, so that
they might all be subjected to ‘subordination, docility, attention in studies
and exercises, and to the correct practice of duties and all the parts of
discipline’. So that they might all be
like one another”. [14]
Master Sun, when writing on formation states:
“In
ancient times skillful warriors first made themselves invincible, and then
watched for vulnerability in their opponents”.
[15]
From
these two great thinkers we can see for our purposes that any part of us that
is not in line with our desire for control is keeping us from our goal of
self-control. It should therefore be
seen as an enemy and we should begin to search for its weakness (or ours that
allows it to be our enemy, as the case may be) and begin to defend our self
from it. Master Sun, in his writings on
force, tells us:
“In
battle, confrontation is done directly, victory is gained by surprise.”[16]
With this
same thinking in mind we can look and see how whenever a part of us, one of our
appetites, seeks control for itself we realize it after it has happened. There was never a forewarning from within
that it was coming. Conversely, we must
come to know ourselves so well that we can surprise our appetites by their
finding themselves to be ultimately under our control. For when we are in control of all parts of
our self we can then approach life as an unstoppable force. We can build up our momentum as all parts are
acting as one, not fighting against one another. Master Sun writes:
“Getting
people (in our case, the individual parts of the one) to fight by letting the
force of momentum work is like rolling logs and rocks. Logs and rocks are still when in a secure
place, but roll on an incline; they remain stationary if square, they roll if
round. Therefore, when people are
skillfully led into battle, the momentum is like that of round rocks rolling
down a high mountain-this is force.”[17]
Du Mu further
enlightens this writing with his comment:
“Roll
rocks down a ten-thousand-foot mountain, and they cannot be stopped-this is
because of the mountain, not the rocks.
Get people to fight with courage to win every time, and the strong and
the weak unite- this is because of the momentum, not the individuals.”[18]
A body
with its parts united can become a powerful force, as there is unity,
direction, and control through discipline.
Another
advantage to this self-awareness through self-discipline is that one comes to
realize the similarities between him and others. Others may be friends, enemies, or just
another person encountered in the living.
The ability to see this will enable one to know the others by observing
them from without using the knowledge gained from one’s own study of the
self. With this advantage one is more
apt to quickly assess situations, more efficiently react, and thereby not find
ones self on that inner battleground struggling for the correct decision. Master Sun writes:
“So it is
said that if you know others and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a
hundred battles; if you do not know others but know yourself, you will win one
and lose one; if you do not know others and do not know yourself, you will be
imperiled in every single battle”[19]
When
engaged in the battle that is life, it is best approached from a calm,
balanced, and fore studied standpoint.
It should be known that all parts of an individual can still desire
control in all situations, however, the practice of discipline will prepare one
for all such situations. Master Sun, in
dealing with the prospect of armed struggle writes:
“Using
order to deal with the disorderly, using calm to deal with the clamorous, is
mastering the heart”[20]
Calmness and stability can be achieved which allows for the mind to become peaceful. One can then address the attack and not become disturbed by all that surrounds one.
In
closing, we will address the issue of justice, how it may be applied within
that it might exist with out. Justice
has long been defined as an equal and fair treatment of all individuals no
matter their place in life. All should
be treated equally that it might not be said one is treated lightly or cruelly,
but that all are treated justly. All the
parts of the individual must not only be under equal authority but also equal
acknowledgement. They must be recognized
as a part and not dismissed for fear of denial building into resentment. Each part, as said earlier, must be seen as a
student being disciplined for service to the one. This is how one will ultimately exist with
justice within ones self. All parts of
the self must be acknowledged and all kept in check, watched over from all view
points to keep them from making the surprise attack. Foucault, when writing on Panopticism, talks
of a prison system wherein all parts can be observed, regulated, and recorded,
all for the purpose of maintaining the order of those incarcerated. Once the appetites, the desires of the
individual, can be seen as imprisoned within the panoptic view of the mind and
its focus on being the sole authority of this machine, all can be known about
the self. It is not right for one part
of the individual to be in charge over all the others, it is not a just
situation. It may be said that for
justice to exist one must first begin to live justly.
If one begins to see these things in light of living in the face of death, it becomes all the more imperative to have control over the parts. This being done so that the whole might fully live without being tossed to and fro from one desire to another. Master Sun addresses the varying grounds that battle is done on. One of these is called dying ground. Dying ground is where all people must eventually find themselves. Master Sun writes:
“When
you will survive if you fight quickly and perish if you do not, this is called
dying ground.”[21]
When found on dying ground, one must assess who is in control. Is it the whole over the self with true living occurring in each moment of life, or is one part of the whole leading all of the others into where it wants to go? Mei Yaochen elaborates on Master Sun by saying:
“When you
cannot press forward, cannot retreat backward, and cannot run to the sides, you
have no choice but to fight right away.”[22]
There is
no “then” and there is no “later” assured of, there is only the now. The battleground of life is before us and we
stand on dying ground. Each moment is
there for us to do battle with our passions that they might be brought under
our control. Through this practicing of
self-discipline, the fullness of life can be grasped in each dying moment. The one in charge of the battle is to be the
self. Its army of passions all working
together and in harmony allow for an existence wherein dying ground holds no
concern for the self. It has been
acknowledged, accepted, and the self is facing it with the challenge of
living.
Jason L. Bryant is a double
major in Religion and Philosophy at
Foucault, Michel. (1977).
Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (A. Sheridan, trans.)
Excellent book on the development of
systems of punishment and how it evolved into modern rehabilitative
practices. The section on Discipline is
most helpful for the direction of my paper.
Tzu, Sun.
(6th cent. B.C.) The
Art of War. (T. Cleary, trans.
(1988)).
A book that has developed from guidelines
for actual confrontation and battle to one that is useful to anyone trying
master anything including the self. This
edition contains an extensive amount of commentaries from many ancient masters
on all of Master Sun’s approaches to
the art.
[1] Foucault, Pg. 135
[2] Sun-Tzu, Pg. 41
[3] Foucault, Pg. 138
[4] Foucault, Pg. 138
[5] Sun-Tzu, Pg. 43
[6] Tzu, Pg. 42
[7] Foucault, Pg. 141
[8] Tzu, Pg. 56
[9] Foucault, Pg. 170
[10] Tzu, Pg. 71
[11] Tzu, Pg. 71
[12] Foucault, Pg.181-2
[13] Foucault, Pg. 183
[14] Foucault, Pg. 182
[15] Tzu, Pg. 84
[16] Tzu, Pg. 94
[17] Tzu, Pg. 99
[18] Tzu, Pg. 99
[19] Tzu, Pg. 82
[20] Tzu, Pg. 121
[21] Tzu, Pg. 150
[22] Tzu, Pg. 150